http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001130024
In consideration of Pat Robertson's remarks, please read the following passages from Alexander Pope's "An Essay on Man:"
(lines 61-69)
When the proud steed shall know why man restrains
His fiery course, or drives him o'er the plains;
When the dull ox, why now he breaks the clod,
Is now a victim, and now Egypt's god:
Then shall man's pride and dullness comprehend
His actions', passions', being's, use and end;
Why doing, suff'ring, check'd, impell'd; and why
This hour a slave, the next a deity.
(Lines 141-164)
But errs not nature from this gracious end,
From burning suns when livid deaths descend,
When earthquakes swallow, or when tempests sweep
Towns to one grave, whole nations to the deep?...
If plagues or earthquakes break not Heav'n's design,
Why then a Borgia, or a Catiline?
Who knows but he, whose hand the light'ning forms,
Who heaves old ocean, and who wings the storms;
Pours fierce ambition in a Caesar's mind,
Or turns young Ammon loose to scourge mankind?
From pride, from pride, our very reas'ning springs;
Account for moral as for nat'ral things:
Why charge we heav'n in those, in these acquit?
In both, to reason right is to submit.
In your opinion, does it seem as though Pat Robertson is arguing the same point
as Alexander Pope; that is, are they both in a sense claiming that all disaster and
suffering in the world is not in the hands of man but rather a part of God's plan?
When Robertson claims that the suffering in Haiti can be explained by a "pact with
the devil," what is he implying about the role of man in disasters and preventing
future suffering? What is Alexander Pope saying when he tells us to just "submit?"
You can answer these specific questions or give your general impression. I think
that this is an important topic and I would really like to hear what you think!